![]() ![]() ![]() She mentions spriggans as the “police force of the fae”, yet in folklore, they just hate people and cause trouble for no reason. (There’s that insistence on syncretism at all costs…) She also name drops many types of fae, yet she doesn’t understand their purposes. For example, there is no way that old-time Europeans knew anything about chakras, yet she presents it as a real thing. The author’s “research” is also incredibly inaccurate and bizarrely vague. ![]() Alexander tacks on “thank the fairies for their help.” The fairies literally have no purpose and nothing meaningful to do with her rituals.Ĭontrary to her matter-of-fact tone, fairies are not responsible for the world’s natural processes, nor are they waiting around for Wiccans to give them a purpose, nor do they lack emotion. ![]() It’s the typical ahistorical Wiccan propaganda that traffics way too heavily in syncretism, and all the illogical associations therein, at the expense of truth, knowledge, or sanity.Įvery “spell” in this book is the expected Wiccan nonsense about buying highly specific objects, leaving litter all over the natural world, and so on - except in this book, Ms. This book is written by a hack and intended only for other hacks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |